Monthly Archive for January, 2009

President Barak Obama and INTA

The International Trademark Association (INTA) has sent President Obama a written request asking him to strengthen the United States legislation regarding the protection of intellectual property rights. The letter points out the importance of fighting against counterfeiting, as it jeopardizes the health and safety of consumers, as well as the companies whose products are being counterfeited.

INTA has emphasized the necessity of improving the funding in this area and providing better enforcement instruments for the Department of Justice. Besides that, INTA has requested the amendment of the current customs statutes in order to facilitate the detention and seizure of counterfeit products at ports of entry in the United States.

Showcase Your Creativity and Express Your Notion on Piracy Today

In the context of an anti piracy campaign, the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS) is organizing the first anti piracy trailer contest.

As a key initiative to promote anti piracy messages to the public, since 2004 anti piracy trailers have been screened in cinemas by the HIP (Honour Intellectual Property) Alliance.

Due to the fact that this action has proven to be an effective channel for the public to receive a clear anti piracy message as in further surveys 60% of the respondents recalled seeing these anti piracy trailers at the cinemas.

The contest is directed to students studying in Singaporean Polytechnics and Institutes of Technical Education who are aspiring to be film makers. Supported by the Motion Picture Association International (MPA), the contest will allow participants to pick up useful tips in a workshop on making short video clips. Giving special attention to the theme of Perils of piracy, partakers will have their creative works evaluated by film industry and IP professionals.

For details of the contest, log on to www.ipos.gov.sg/antipiracytrailer. Registration closes on 30 Jan 2009.

King of Thailand Receives WIPO Award for Contribution to Intellectual Property

Last January 14, the King of Thailand, His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej, was granted with the WIPO Global Leader Award in recognition of his outstanding commitment to promoting intellectual property and his important contribution to society as a creative inventor. The ceremony presided by Mr. Francis Gurry, WIPO Director General, and was held at the Klai Kangwon Palace in Hua Hin, Thailand.

During the event Mr. Gurry had the opportunity of pointing out some of the Kings achievements: In sharing the fruits of your creativity in the form of invention and musical and artistic works, Your Majesty has not only demonstrated the power of intellectual property to enrich and enhance the quality of daily life and work but has also encouraged people everywhere to create, respect and protect it.

In order to understand the origin of this award, it is important to have in mind that the King of Thailand is a highly praised artist with a portfolio of over 1,000 works, including paintings, photos, musical and literary works. He is also a gifted inventor holding over 20 patents and 19 trademarks. Many of the Kings inventions have generated concrete and practical benefits for rural communities in Thailand.

Orthographic Agreement Affects Company Names

While the Brazilians were just trying to adapt to new rules of the Portuguese language, the spelling of public agencies and private companies is highlighted in the facades of buildings, shops and products sold to the population.

Under the agreement spelling, in force since the beginning of the month, some brands and names of institutions are achieved. This is the case of Pompia Stores, with more than 50 establishments across the Rio Grande do Sul. Founded in 1953 in the municipality of Camaqu the company was registered with acute accent, as the agreement spelling in force at the time. For the new rule, the diphthong ‘i’ and ‘i’ do not use accent anymore.

But the unification of the language in countries that have Portuguese as official language will not make that the company change the spelling. “We have a visual identity between our brand and the public, so we decided not remove the accent”, explains the superintendent of Marketing and Sales of Stores Pompia, Carmem Ferro. According to her, the change in spelling of the brand would involve a very high cost in the shops and visual material.

In the same situation is one of the largest industries in the world of shoes, the Azaleia. Established in the 50s, in the municipality of Parob, the company now exports to over 80 countries. The directors of the company have not yet decided whether the product sold for several Brazilian regions of Brazil and out of the country will adopt the change.

The National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) has remained silent on the issue of brands. The official position should be announced only after the publication of the Spelling Vocabulary Portuguese Language (Volpe) by the Brazilian Academy of Letters (ABL).

1st-to-File System Often a Test of Patience

Almost every country grants trademark rights on a first come first served basis.

Under this first to file system, the applicant who is the quickest at registering a trademark is exclusively allowed to own and use it. Except in the United States, where the first to actually use a trademark in business is given priority.

In most countries that have opted for the first to file system, including Japan and China, an objection can be filed in court against a person or company whose trademark application has not yet been officially granted.

Still after the finalization of trademark registration, a complaint can be presented, for up to a fixed period, to request the annulment of the trademark right.

Nevertheless, it is important to mention that a claimant in search of somebody else’s trademark right cancellation is required to prove that the trademark at issue has in fact been extensively used by the claimant and already has achieved a high degree of name recognition. The argument can be extended if the accused objects to the court decision.

In Japanese a sake brewer, whose brand name had been registered in China by a Chinese man without the brewer’s knowledge, acquired the trademark right by paying 15 million yen to the man so it could export sake to China his Japanese trademark. Apparently this measure is less time consuming than having to go through a Chinese court.

The Japan External Trade Organization has stated that there are numerous Chinese individuals and companies registering trademarks that could be sold to Japanese firms.

An official of the National Federation of Agricultural Cooperative Associations (Zenno) said, “Should Japanese companies be so loose in negotiating with the Chinese that hold Japanese related trademark rights, it would only encourage the dubious businesses surrounding trademark disputes.”

Under the TRIPS Agreement (Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 1995), member states are required to take legal actions for protecting the appellations of origin regarding items such as wine and distilled liquor. Trademark registration of these place names by people who have no direct connection with these regions should be rejected.